How to Praise a Child's Drawing: What to Say Instead of "Good Job"

In 1973, Mark Lepper and colleagues at Stanford published an experiment with children aged 3 to 5 at a nursery school: the paper by Lepper, Greene and Nisbett. They took children who already liked drawing with felt-tip markers and split them into three groups. One group was told in advance that they would get a certificate for drawing. Another group was given the certificate without being told beforehand, and the last group got nothing.
Later, when the drawing materials were put out during free play, the group that had been promised the certificate spent less time drawing than the other two groups. The usual reading is that drawing for its own sake had been replaced by drawing for the certificate.
The experiment used a certificate, not words of praise. Even so, I often think of it when considering how adults respond to a childâs drawing. In this post I write about research on praise and some things you can say instead of âgood jobâ or âthatâs beautifulâ.
Research on praise
The best-known research on praise comes from the psychologist Carol Dweck and her colleagues. In a 1998 paper by Mueller and Dweck, fifth graders solved problems and were split into a group praised for ability (âyou must be smartâ) and a group praised for effort (âyou must have worked hardâ). After they then met harder problems and failed, the children praised for ability tended to show less persistence and less enjoyment than those praised for effort.
This was a study of problem solving, not drawing. It also cannot tell us whether âgood jobâ works the same way as âyouâre smartâ.
A review of research on praise and childrenâs motivation is Henderlong and Lepperâs 2002 paper. It concludes that praise does not always raise motivation and does not always lower it. The effect depends on how it is given, including whether it comes across as sincere and whether it leaves the childâs sense of choosing for themselves intact.
I read these studies not as âstop praisingâ, but as âthink a little about what you say and howâ.
What is wrong with âgood jobâ?
I donât think saying âgood jobâ is bad in itself. Children feel that the adult is pleased, and that makes them happy.
What concerns me is when it is the only thing we say. âGood jobâ is a verdict, so the conversation ends the moment it is said. If every drawing gets the same words, I think children notice that the adult is not really looking. And if all they receive are verdicts, they may start drawing to be called good. In Lepperâs experiment, drawing for a certificate reduced interest in drawing. I worry that drawing for an adultâs approval could shrink the pleasure of drawing in the same way.
What to say instead
Say what you see
This is the simplest, and it works for any drawing.
âThere are lots of red swirls.â âYour line goes all the way to the edge of the paper.â âOnly this part is yellow.â
You just put into words what you notice, with no judgment. The child can tell that you looked closely. It works for scribbles too.
Talk about how it was made
This means talking about the drawing as it was being made, rather than the finished picture.
âYou drew this line slowly.â âYou used lots of colours.â âYou kept going to the end.â âYou coloured this part really hard.â
I think this points in a similar direction to Dweckâs finding that praising effort worked better. How a child drew is something they decided, so they can use it the next time they draw.
Ask about the drawing
When you ask âWhat is it?â, a child may feel there is a right answer. Sometimes they have not decided what it is, and if an adult guesses wrong, they can be disappointed.
If you ask âTell me about your drawingâ or âWhich part do you like best?â, the child gets to decide the answer. They donât have to answer at all.
Say how you feel
âI like this colour.â âIâm glad you showed me.â
This shares the adultâs feelings instead of a verdict. You can show you are pleased without bringing in a standard like âgoodâ.
Let the child decide
âWhere should we hang it?â âShall we show Grandma?â
Letting the child decide what happens to the drawing tells them, I think, that it is treated as their own work.
Things I would try to avoid
Comparing with other children. âBetter than your brotherâsâ may be meant as praise, but it teaches the child to see drawings as a ranking.
Correcting. It is tempting to say âthe sky is blueâ or âpeople have necksâ. The guide I mentioned in my earlier post Stages of Drawing in Young Children also recommends not correcting drawings at this age or asking children to copy set shapes.
Promising a reward for drawing. This is what the experiment at the top shows. While drawing is fun in itself, I believe it is better not to bring rewards into it.
If you have already said âgood jobâ
Habits of speech do not change overnight. I think it is enough to add one thing you see after it. âGood job. Thereâs so much blue.â That alone turns a verdict into a conversation.
About Kinder Paint
I make Kinder Paint, a drawing app for children ages 2 to 6 on iPhone and iPad. I donât think of it as a replacement for paper and crayons. With that said, a few things in the app relate to this post.
Drawings save to the deviceâs photos, and the canvases are lined up in the appâs Gallery. Putting a few side by side and talking about them, âLast time it was swirls, and today the circle is closedâ, works well, I think, as a next step from saying what you see.
Paint Academy is a set of tracing lessons. When the child finishes one, the app shows a score and a celebration dialog. If you would rather not show the score, you can turn off Show Score in Parental Settings. Parental Settings open only after answering a multiplication question, so a child is unlikely to change it by accident. Paint Academy is part of the paid Kinder Paint Pro subscription, with a free trial lesson.
The basic drawing features are free, and the free plan saves up to three canvases. There are no ads and no account.
Getting Started with Kinder Paint covers the first session, and Stages of Drawing in Young Children covers how drawing develops.
